Maddenation

Justification for the essayist

Said Honore Balzac (according to my A Word A Day email):

Vocations which we wanted to pursue, but didn’t, bleed, like colors, on the whole of our existence.

Thus am I an essayist, whose purpose it is to pursue all vocations, to never get pigeonholed, to write what interests me, to say in hard words what I think today, though it contradict everything I said yesterday. I love it!

PatrickQuotes10/07/05 2 comments

Comments

Dad • 10/14/05 11:35 PM:

Ah, but you are not pursuing all vocations, but only thinking and writing about them, which is not the same. The problem (actually, he doesn’t say it’s a problem) Balzac is so aptly referring to is one of having missed your calling to pursue another, perhaps more lucrative or less competitive or more “acceptable” profession. While being an essayist is a great calling, and one that perhaps fits you best, it is, nonetheless a specific vocation. The bleeding Balzac refers to relates more to the salesman who always wanted to be an actor; the engineer who should have been a scientist; the housewife who never sought a singing career.

Patrick • 10/15/05 10:38 AM:

I agree with you mostly, but I hold on to my argument that an essayist can pursue a number of “vocations” or at least interests. Especially when I see how my colleagues (in English or in other departments) pretty much have to become experts on a very small area of knowledge, always writing about, say, Samuel Beckett, and within Beckett Studies, finding some small niche that hasn’t been explored yet, that’s when I’m plum pleased to be an essayist who can write about whatever strikes his fancy.

Post a comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)

Please capitalize your name properly and use the same information each time you comment. We will not send you spam, and your email address will not be posted.


Remember me?

Formatting
*bold*=bold
_italic_=italic
"link":http://url.com=link


Styles
Search

Entries Comments Both
Archives
Related Entries
  1. O’Reilly Strikes Again
    Bill O’Reilly is Bill O’Reilly, and an essayist is an essayist, and never the twain shall meet.
  1. An Essay
    “God never wrought miracle to convince atheism, because his ordinary works convince it.” An essay about why atheists are wrong.
  1. Justification for the Blog
    The author of an Economist review of James Thurber’s collected letters laments: One of the quiet losses of our era…
  1. The Nigger of the Narcissus
    A work that aspires, however humbly, to the condition of art should carry its justification in every line.
  1. Michigan Essay
    The University of Michigan, fresh out of Supreme Court, where it lost the battle to preserve its old admissions policy,…
Validation

XHTML & CSS